I'm a US-based QA engineer who helps startups and product teams ship with confidence β building custom test automation across web, mobile and desktop apps, plus AI-feature testing and the tooling to keep it all fast. No offshore handoffs. No long-term contracts.
Best fit: teams shipping web, mobile or desktop products weekly β especially the parts most testers skip.
Most growing teams don't need a big QA department. They just need someone who quietly plugs in, keeps an eye on quality, and lets everyone ship with a calm mind.
Know what works before your users do β so every deploy feels like a green light, not a gamble.
Let automation handle the repetitive checks, so your team stays focused on building instead of clicking through the same flows.
Same timezone, clear communication, reports you can act on right away β quality that feels like part of the team.
Pick what fits your stage. Not sure? Start with a free audit and I'll recommend the smallest thing that solves your biggest risk.
Stop testing the same flows by hand.
The human-judgment layer AI can't replace.
Build a process that scales with you.
Shipping AI into your product? I test the parts traditional QA can't: LLM feature behavior, hallucination & accuracy checks, and non-deterministic outputs β so your AI features are dependable in the real world, not just impressive in a demo.
Low-risk start: if those first 20 hours don't surface something worth fixing, you don't pay for them.
Work by contract (monthly retainer or fixed-scope) or simply hourly ($50β$95/hr) β most teams pick a monthly retainer for predictable cost and steady coverage. We'll choose whatever fits your stage.
The win isn't a cheaper tester β it's having someone in your timezone who treats your product's quality like their own, and makes the whole thing feel easy.
Same-day communication, no 12-hour lag, no language barrier. I work like part of your team β because effectively I am.
No account managers, no rotating juniors, no offshore handoffs. You deal directly with the senior who does the work β and I stay involved in every project, personally.
When off-the-shelf tools fall short, I build my own β like AI-assisted visual checks that flag where a build drifts from its design spec, and record-and-replay for flows that are painful to script. AI speeds up coverage; human judgment catches the rest.
No long-term contracts. Start with 20 hours, scale up or pause anytime. Built for how startups actually operate.
You get the senior who does the work β direct, no handoff to a junior. Here's what that's delivered.
I've spent 7+ years leading QA inside product teams β building automation from scratch, running CI pipelines, and mentoring QA engineers. Fully remote, US-based. References from past teams available on request.

I've spent 7+ years in software QA β from manual testing in e-commerce to building automation frameworks from scratch for SaaS, desktop, and mobile/AR products, and leading a QA team as a Lead QA Automation Engineer. I started Greenlight QA because I kept seeing the same thing: great products held back by avoidable bugs and shaky release processes.
I take on a limited number of projects at a time β usually just a few β so each client gets senior, hands-on attention, not a spot in a queue. I'm now growing a small, hand-picked team of US-based specialists to extend that capacity, while staying personally involved in every engagement. If your team is shipping fast and quality is starting to feel like a liability, that's exactly where I help most.
Tools I work with: Selenium Β· Appium Β· WinAppDriver Β· Java Β· C# Β· TestNG Β· Spring Boot Β· REST Assured Β· Postman Β· JMeter Β· Jenkins Β· Allure Β· Jira Β· BrowserStack
No. We start with a 20-hour minimum engagement so I can deliver something real. After that you can scale up, move to a monthly retainer, or pause β whatever fits.
I'm US-based and work in your timezone, so communication is same-day and direct. You talk to the person actually testing your product β no account managers, no rotating juniors, no overnight lag.
Usually both, in the right order. We'll figure that out in the free audit. Automation pays off for repetitive regression flows; hands-on QA catches the messy edge cases. I won't sell you a framework you don't need yet.
A 30-minute call where I look at your product and current process, identify your biggest quality risks, and recommend the smallest next step that moves the needle. No obligation.
Only a few at a time. I cap active projects so each one gets my direct, senior attention β and I'm growing a small US-based team to extend that without diluting it. If I'm at capacity, I'll tell you honestly and we'll line up a start date that works.
Either. Most teams run a monthly retainer or a fixed-scope contract for predictable cost; straight hourly is available when that fits better. We'll pick whatever suits your stage.
Hourly rates start at $50β$95 depending on the work. Most clients move to a predictable monthly retainer or a fixed-scope quote after the first engagement. I'll give you a clear number before we start.
Book a free 30-minute QA audit, or send a message. I usually reply within a day.
Prefer email? artromqa@gmail.com